 |
Originally published as a Consultant's Connection
column in Pro AV Magazine
|
Getting
with the Program
It takes input
from all three of these elements to create a good AV program: the
management's vision, the end-user's applications and the technical
staff's operations.
By Tim Cape, CTS-D
More and more often (but still not
often enough), AV
consultants are brought into an AV-centric project when they should
be—early.
There is a long list of reasons why this should be, but the most
important is
to establish realistic budgets and functional physical requirements in
a new or
existing building. The physical requirements include such important
parameters
as adequate square footage for AV equipment, projection and storage
rooms, as
well as sufficient floor-to-floor height to accommodate good sight
lines and
appropriate image heights. If these issues are not adequately addressed
at the
start, then the results will be either unworkable or compromised at
best.
In parallel with the architectural
programming, including
a needs-analysis based on functional requirements provided by the
owners and
users of the new facilities there should also be an AV programming
process to
establish the functional needs and the impact of any AV systems within
the new
spaces. The project then proceeds from programming through conceptual
design,
schematic design, design development and finally to the construction
documents
from which the project will be built.
The program document, properly
prepared, is the playbook
by which the rest of the design process is executed. It establishes the
goals
and functions that the design (and ultimately the building) is supposed
to
support. For the AV consultant, the program document can be as widely
varied as
the individuals who prepare it—a situation that hopefully will change.
The
problem lies in the fact that there is not a strong tradition of our
specialty
being involved in this architectural process nor is there any agreed
upon basic
standard definition of what an AV program is.
By
Invitation Only
Mechanical, electrical and
structural engineers are always
requested to be a part of the programming process because the architect
knows
that their expertise is required to establish the functional
requirements for
their trade and (equally importantly) to help establish or verify
realistic
budgets for construction. For the owner's part, the facilities
department (if
there is one) is brought in to help establish the more technical
requirements
from the standpoint of issues, such as design consistency, operations
and
existing infrastructure. Department heads, administrators and some
end-users
are usually a part of the discussions to contribute to the definition
of
functional requirements for the facility under design.
When it comes to AV, however, we
aren't always invited to
the party, and this is often true for both the AV designers on the
architect's
team, as well as the AV techs on the owner's staff. If AV pros aren't a
part of
this early process, trouble ensues (as many of us have experienced).
The later
we are brought in, the more compromises have to be made in meeting the
AV
functionality of a building, particularly one where AV is a significant
element
of the building's purpose. So why aren't we on the invitation list?
Bringing in AV expertise late in
the design process is
usually the result of the owner and/or architect not having been
through the
process on this type of facility before. Once an AV-centric building is
built
without the proper expertise involved at the proper time, everyone
involved
learns the hard lesson and becomes initiated into the society of the
experienced.
The Right
Team at
the Right Time
Getting qualified AV design
assistance is not necessarily
an easy task, and it's only part of the solution. The right people on
the
owner's side also need to be involved to get the right information.
Consultants
need to know not just what the senior administrators' vision is, but
what the
day-to-day end-users do now, what they think they need to do in the
future and help
them understand what their options are technologically. Consultants
also need
to interact with the owner's technical staff to get the skinny from the
folks
that speak their language. Unfortunately these technical people are
sometimes
left out and what could be important operational insights become
unfortunate
oversights.
It takes input from all three of
these elements to create
a good AV program: the management's vision, the end-user's applications
and the
technical staff's operations. In addition, how these elements are
interpreted
and presented are then extremely important. In preparing the AV
program,
Premise Number One is: “An equipment list does not an AV program.”
Though some
mention of source types and quantities, projector quantities and
performance
parameters and other equipment-specific information is usually
included, it's
the functional descriptions (often with conceptual graphical layouts of
each
space) that make the AV program effective.
Getting the owner's staff involved
is sometimes easy and
sometimes not. Sometimes, the internal workings of a large organization
are
deep and mysterious and fraught with danger at every turn. For example,
getting
the AV technical staff involved often goes something like the following
anecdote.
Some of the AV people work for the
IT department while
others work for individual departments. The facilities people don't
really
consider them part of the building operations, so they don't ask them
to the
programming meetings. The administrators know the technology guys
should be
there, so the IT representative is brought in, but he really doesn't
know what
the AV guys do, so their requirements are underrepresented at best. The
architect knows they will need an AV consultant, and they are going to
bring
them in early—when they are starting construction documents (or about
three or four
phases too late) so they don't ask for the AV people to be there. The
actual
users ask for things like projectors and screens and everyone thinks
this is
all anyone needs to know. Besides, all the equipment can be bought on
the
internet, right? Sound familiar?
To avert this nightmare that is
sometimes reality, AV pros
should be just as much a part of the design team as the mechanical and
electrical consultants are. In addition, facility owners need to
realize the
need for their own AV people to provide input in the early stages of a
project,
as well as the appropriate end-users. And the AV industry needs to
learn how to
create an effective, functional AV program document that will serve a
design
process that may last for two years or more. If AV pros are going to be
an
integral part of the building design and construction industry, we all
have to
learn to get with the program.
|